Skip to main content
Salinas Marketing

Original research · August 2026

The State of
Salinas Business
Websites.

In August 2026 we took the member directory of the Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce — 617 businesses, the whole list, not a sample of it — and checked the website of every one.

One in five could not be reached at all. Not slow, not dated: unreachable. Either the listing gave no web address, or the address on it led nowhere. These are businesses that pay dues to be findable.

Everything below is a count of what came back from a request. Nothing here is an opinion about anybody’s website, no business is named, and the method is written out at the bottom so that anybody who wants to repeat it can.

Businesses checked
617
Collected
23 August 2026
Source
One, named below
Businesses named
None

The headline

126 of 596 businesses have no working website.

That is 21.1% — a little over one in five. The remaining 470 (78.9%) have an address on their listing that answers with a real page.

21 of the 617 are absent from that figure and from every other figure on this page. Twenty of them run bot protection that turned an automated request away twice, and a website that refuses a script is not a broken website — scoring it as one would be the easiest way for a study like this to mislead. The twenty-first has an address on its listing with no top-level domain in it, which is a typing error on a directory rather than a fact about a business. That leaves 596.

One dot per business. 596 dots; the 126 lit ones have no working website. The grid has no other meaning — position on it says nothing about any business.

The three ways a business lands in that 126

  • 78 list no website at all (13.1% of 596)
  • 44 list an address that does not work (7.4% of 596)
  • 4 list a social profile instead of a website (0.7% of 596)

The part worth pausing on

Forty-four list an address that does not work.

A business with no website on its listing at least knows it has no website. These forty-four are the other case: they paid to be listed, they gave an address, and the address is dead. Nobody has told them, because the only people who find out are customers who do not call.

  • the address returns a "page not found"15
  • the domain no longer resolves anywhere12
  • the server never answers8
  • the security certificate is rejected by browsers4
  • the address redirects in a loop2
  • the encrypted connection fails2
  • the listed address fails and so does the domain behind it1

The twelve at the top of that list are the worst of it. Those domain names do not resolve anywhere — not to a parked page, not to an error page, to nothing. A customer who types one gets the browser’s own failure screen, which reads to most people as though the business has closed.

A further 4 listings send people to a www. address that does not resolve while the same address without the www. works perfectly well. We counted those 4 as having a website, because they do. What they have is a listing pointing at a hostname their own DNS does not serve, and it is the cheapest thing on this page to fix.

The 470 that do work

What the working sites are missing.

Everything from here on is measured against the 470 businesses whose site actually served a page, because those are the only ones with a page to read. Each line below is a plain absence — a tag that is not there, a link that is not there — not a judgement about design.

  • no tap-to-call link anywhere on the home page232 of 470(49.4%)
  • a page title that is missing, generic, or just the name166 of 470(35.3%)
  • no structured data for a search or answer engine to read159 of 470(33.8%)
  • no meta description108 of 470(23.0%)
  • no main heading on the page97 of 470(20.6%)
  • not built to resize to a phone45 of 470(9.6%)
  • still loads over http, which browsers mark "Not secure"21 of 470(4.5%)

The largest single gap

Half of them cannot be called from a phone.

232 of the 47049.4% — have no tap-to-call link anywhere on their home page. The number is usually printed there as text. On a phone, text is something a person has to read, remember, leave the page for, and type into a keypad, and a fair share of them do not come back.

This is the figure most exposed to the limitation described at the bottom of this page. We read each page as the server sends it, before any JavaScript runs, and 27 of the 470 sent almost no text that way. For those, the real answer may be better than what we recorded. It cannot be worse.

Where you are

One in five names the town it is in.

96 of the 470 live sites — 20.4% — put the word Salinas in their page title. The title is the line a search engine shows as the link, and it is one of the few things on a page that every search engine and every answer engine reads.

We are not claiming that adding a place name moves a ranking. This study did not measure rankings and says nothing about them. What it can say is that 374 of these businesses do not state, in the one line their search result shows, where they are — and that 166 of them use a title that is missing, generic, or nothing but the business name, which tells a searcher only what they already typed.

Five things, scored

Only 174 sites get all five basics right.

Five checks, each one either done or not done, none of them a matter of taste:

  1. 01loads over https
  2. 02resizes to a phone
  3. 03has a page title that says something
  4. 04has a meta description
  5. 05has structured data
  • 1745 of 537.0%
  • 1634 of 534.7%
  • 793 of 516.8%
  • 422 of 58.9%
  • 81 of 51.7%
  • 40 of 50.9%

174 sites (37.0%) do all five. 54 do two or fewer. The shape of that distribution is the useful part: most of these businesses are not far off. The common case is a site that does four of the five and is missing one thing, usually the structured data or the description.

How old

A fifth print a copyright year of 2024 or earlier.

328 of the 470 live sites print a copyright year somewhere on the page. Of those, 66 (20.1%) print 2024 or earlier, and the oldest we found was 2006.

  • 237202672.3%
  • 2520257.6%
  • 1420244.3%
  • 522023 or older15.9%

Treat this one gently. A copyright year is a weak signal: plenty of well-kept sites never print one at all, and 142 of these did not. It is evidence about a footer, not about a business. It is on this page because it was measured, and leaving out a measurement because it is inconvenient to interpret is how a study becomes an argument.

Speed, for the same reason: the median site answered in 0.69 seconds and the slowest tenth in over 1.86. That is one fetch each, from one machine, on one afternoon, and it is not a page-speed score. It is reported because we have it.

If you run one of these businesses

Five things, in the order we would do them.

None of this needs an agency. All five are an afternoon for whoever built the site, and four of them are free.

  1. 01

    Type your own web address into a phone.

    Not a bookmark, not a search — the address exactly as it is printed on your chamber listing, your Google Business Profile and the side of your van. Forty-four businesses in this study would have found out something useful in the ten seconds that takes.

  2. 02

    Make the phone number a link.

    It is one line of HTML, it is the single most common gap in this study, and it turns a number a customer has to copy into one they tap.

  3. 03

    Put what you do and where you do it in the page title.

    Three hundred and seventy-four of these sites do not say Salinas in theirs, and a third use a title that is only the business name.

  4. 04

    Check the padlock.

    Twenty-one working sites still land visitors on http, where every current browser writes “Not secure” next to the address. Four others never loaded for us at all because their certificate is rejected outright, which is the same warning screen a customer would get.

  5. 05

    Add the structured data.

    A third of these sites have none. It is the part of a page an answer engine reads when it is deciding what a business is, and it is the item on this list most likely to matter more next year than it does now.

Method

How this was done.

The sample frame. Every business listed in the Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce member directory on 23 August 2026. The directory returned 698 listings; merging entries that were plainly the same business twice — same domain, or the same name once the Inc and LLC are taken off — left 617 distinct businesses. This is a census of that directory, not a sample of it: every member was checked.

What was read from the listing. The business name, the category the chamber files it under, the address, and the web address the chamber shows. That last one is the only source for whether a business “has a website” here. A business could have a site the chamber does not list, and some surely do.

What was done with it. Each web address was fetched the way a browser would fetch it, following redirects, with the certificate checked rather than ignored. Anything that failed was tried again with a full browser header set. Anything that still failed had its domain resolved against two independent public resolvers before this study was willing to call it dead — a check added after a spot inspection caught this machine’s own resolver failing on a domain that was fine.

What was recorded. Whether the address resolved; whether it returned a page; whether the browser ends up on https; whether the page declares a mobile viewport at device width; whether it has a tap-to-call link; the page title, and whether it is more than the business name; whether there is a meta description, a main heading, and structured data; and the copyright year if the page prints one.

Who was left out, and why. Twenty businesses whose sites answered an automated request with a block page on both attempts, and one whose listed address has no top-level domain in it. Both groups are out of every fraction on this page rather than counted as failures.

Other directories, and why none of them are here. Four more were tried. YellowPages and Yelp refused automated access outright. The Better Business Bureau and Opendi both answered, and both were discarded for the same reason: neither shows a business’s own website on its listings at all, so importing them would have turned a quirk of two page layouts into several hundred businesses that “list no website”. That would have made the sample look three times larger and every headline figure worse, and it would have been an artefact.

The arithmetic. Every figure on this page was produced by a script from the collected data. None was estimated, rounded for effect, or typed from memory.

Limitations

What this study does not show.

  • Nothing about Google rankings, map-pack presence, or reviews. None of it was measured and none of it should be inferred from anything here. This is a study of websites.
  • Chamber members are not all Salinas businesses. They are the businesses that pay dues to be visible, which if anything makes them the more engaged end of the town. The honest reading is that these figures are a best case rather than an average.
  • Pages were read as the server sends them, before JavaScript runs. 27 of the 470 live sites sent almost no text that way. For those, the tap-to-call, structured-data and description counts may understate what a visitor's browser eventually shows.
  • One fetch per site, on one afternoon. A site that was down for an hour that day is recorded as down, and a site that broke the following week is recorded as fine.
  • Only the home page was read. A business whose phone link or structured data sits on a contact page and nowhere else is counted as not having it.
  • The category groupings are ours, built by matching keywords against the chamber’s own category names. They are a convenience for reading, not a taxonomy, and no figure in the findings above depends on them.
  • No individual business is identified anywhere on this page, and the row-level data is not published here for that reason.

For reporters and researchers

Using this.

The findings are free to quote with attribution, and we would rather they were quoted accurately than favourably — if a figure here is wrong we want to know and we will correct it on this page.

The full anonymised dataset, the collection scripts and the aggregation script are available to any newsroom or researcher who asks, so the whole thing can be run again and checked. Row-level data naming individual businesses is not published and will not be.

Salinas Marketing, “The State of Salinas Business Websites”, August 2026. A census of the 617 businesses listed in the Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce member directory, collected 23 August 2026.

Questions, corrections and data requests: the contact page.

We checked 617 websites. We did not check yours.

Every check on this page is one you can run on your own site, and the method is written out above so that you can. If you would rather we did it and told you what we found, that is what the free audit is.

Get Your Free Audit